To Home Page To Home Page
General Description
Requirements
Policy Provisions
Performance Evaluation
Subject Experts
Undergraduate Course and Curriculum Changes
Policy

Document Number: ACAD--102 Revision #: 1.0
Document Owner: Executive VP Date Last Updated: 07/11/2013
Primary Author: VP for Academic Affairs Status: Approved
Date Originally Created: 11/22/2011

General Description
Description:

Undergraduate course and curriculum change policy


Purpose:

Delineation of policy


Scope:

All faculty, staff, students, and administrators


Responsibility: VP for Academic Affairs
Deans
VP for Academic Affairs

Back to Top

Requirements
Relevant Knowledge: In order to comply with this policy you should know:
Current University policy
Standards of good practice
Standard company policies

Terms and Definitions: Additional training

Corrective Action

Loss of privilege, general

Back to Top

Policy Provisions
1.

Undergraduate Course and Curriculum Changes


Changes in undergraduate courses and/or curriculum should normally be initiated by full-time faculty within the School that is intimately associated with the program to be affected by the proposed change. All proposed curriculum changes must be presented on the “Curriculum Change Form” housed in the P drive in the “Curriculum and Course Change” folder (Appendix A). All documentation requested on the form should accompany the proposal when submitted to the School Faculty. With the School Dean’s support, the course/curriculum change will be presented to the full-time Faculty of the School for review. Decisions of approval and rejection are made based upon a two-third majority vote.

 

Any proposal that is approved by the Faculty will be forwarded to UCCCAP for review. School minutes documenting the Faculty’s approval, as well as documentation required on the form (i.e. peer comparisons, learning outcomes, and etc.) should accompany the submission to UCCCAP. After careful consideration of the impact on the University and the benefits to the students, UCCCAP will approve or reject the proposal with a simple majority vote. UCCCAP’s review and final decision will be communicated directly to the School Dean, proposal initiator, and Vice President for Academic Affairs (chair of Dean’s Council).

 

Dean’s Council represents the third level of review for Undergraduate course and curriculum change proposals. The Vice President for Academic Affairs will present the proposal to the council for review. Proposal approval or rejection is determined with a simple majority vote of the Dean’s Council. If approved, the proposal will be submitted to the University President for review. The final decision for implementation of a course and/or curriculum change lies with the President. If the President signs and approves a curriculum change, it will be submitted to the Registrar to implement the change. Note that at each level of review all other review bodies are notified of the decisions made to facilitate effective University communication (Appendix B).

 

Under certain instances an expedited curriculum change process may be more appropriate to utilize than the four-level review process. This process is to be utilized only in situations where the proposed curriculum change does not change the nature, scope, mission, or relationship of the entity to the University Mission. Examples for which the use of this process are appropriate include, minor wording revisions of a School’s and/or Program’s Mission, Goals, Learning Outcomes, and/or Objectives, as well as minor wording revisions of course descriptions. This process should not be used for changes in Missions, Goals, Learning Outcomes, Objectives, or Course descriptions that change the content/scope of the entity. Neither should it be used to introduce or delete courses or curriculum and/or to change credit hours for a course or program of study (Appendix C).

 

By submitting the Expedited Curriculum form to the chair of the UCCCAP committee and the Vice President for Academic Affairs, it is verified that the proposed curriculum/course change does not change the scope of the entity and has received majority approval within the governing School. If a proposal is deemed a significant change in scope or a conflict to the University Mission, it will be returned to the submitting School for Submission through the “regular” curriculum change proposal route of approval (School, UCCCAP, Deans’ Council, and President).

 


Back to Top

Performance Evaluation
Performance Metrics: Compliance with standard policy and procedure
Compliance with federal mandate

Consequences: Further training
Loss of privileges

Back to Top

Subject Experts
The following may be consulted for additional information.
VP for Academic Affairs

Executive VP

VP for Academic Affairs

Back to Top

This page created 10/30/2014 using Zavanta® version 6.0